On Fri, May 29, 2009 2:33 pm, Atte André Jensen wrote:
>> S S S
>> T T T T .... T T T T .... T T T T
>
> As mentioned the two clients I test against misbehaves with this,
> running at 116-117 bpm instead of 112.
I did some playing with sooperlooper, and I think it's calculating the
tempo correctly based on the clock pulses that you feed it. So, if you
get a different tempo... then you're T's aren't spaced right.
I would also try it _without_ the S.
When playing with it, I surprisingly had a hard time getting my midi clock
pulses to send out with the right timing.
> Maybe I should stop thinking so much and just hack away something that
> works for exactly my purpose (I only need to sync with sooperlooper),
> however wrong (according to the standard) it is.
>
> Still, I'd be interrested in any input, though...
Doesn't sooperlooper sync to the JACK transport? (It does on my machine.)
If it were me, I would try that route rather than midi clock. :-)
--
G a b r i e l M B e d d i n g f i e l d
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
