On Tuesday 26 May 2009 02:40:08 Brent Busby wrote: > I wondered what the prevalent opinion was about setting up a software > raid mirror of two sata drives under Linux LVM. This is on a 3.2GHz > quad core AMD system that almost certainly has plenty of free CPU. Will > this provide extra disk i/o that could be usefully applied to getting > more simultaneous tracks, or will using a software mirror interfere with > the RT kernel or cause latency issues/instability somewhere? If you want to be more dynamic with the disc allocation and still have mirroring, consider using mirrored lvm volumes (that is lvm volumes with mirrors, not lvm on a raid1 partition:). For systems where it is necessary to have lots of space and have the base- system up pretty fast after a failure, I have a small 100GB on a sw-raid1 (with ~ 3+1 disks) for / and the rest of the different disks in a lvm group to move/resize partitions as needed. On both lvm and raid1 I had not noticed any performance hit in real-life-applications. BTW: I would always choose a software raid over a hardware one. That way you can still access your raid in another machine when your current machine fails. With hardware raid you always need a second spare hw-controller. And have to by two new ones if the first hw-controller breaks and is no longer manufactured... Another note to get back on topic: ardour has its own (stripping) raid builtin. There is an option to define multiple directories (preferable on multiple partitions/disks) to save the soundfiles to. Have fun, Arnold
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
