On Tuesday 19 May 2009 15:02:59 Patrick Shirkey wrote: > drew Roberts wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 May 2009 09:48:11 Fons Adriaensen wrote: > >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:40:58PM +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > >>> Krzysztof Foltman wrote: > >>>> Ideally, jackdbus shouldn't even allow jackd binary to > >>>> exist in $PATH (and vice versa), to prevent the exact > >>>> kind of situation that Fons is experiencing. > >> > >> Programs that do that kind of things have a name > >> here: malware. I'm the boss on my system, and I > >> will decide what goes into $PATH. Just as I decide > >> which filesystems get mounted and where, and how > >> permissions are set. > > > > Fons, I think some people have misunderstood some things you have said in > > this thread. In this case I think you misunderstood Patrick. (Or I did - > > not a bad possibility.) > > > > I think what he was saying was that jackdbus would check for jackd in > > $PATH and complain bitterly / refuse to sintall / whatever. Not that it > > would try and control what $PATH was set to. Or perhaps you got that and > > I misunderstood your objection. > > Hi Drew, > > If you are referring to me, then I would like to remove myself from the > dbus issue. Hey Patrick, I don't think I was referring to you. "> Krzysztof Foltman wrote:" I think I was referring to what I thought was Fons misunderstanding what Krzysztof wrote. Of if you were referring to me thinking some people had misunderstood some of what Fons had written earlier, I don't remember the details, I just remember thinking when I was reading that some of the heat that seemed to be being generated seemed to be coming from possible misunderstandings or quick scanning of posts. > I am currently concerned about PA usage for non technical > users and/or "Ralf Maldorf's" attitude towards Linux Audio as a platform. > > > > Cheers. > > -- > Patrick Shirkey > Boost Hardware Ltd. all the best, drew > > > If there is proper understanding and objections / differences still > > remain, that is one thing. So often in life we are disagreeing with what > > we think people mean when if fact we may agree with what they actually > > mean. > > > >> Ciao. > > > > all the best, > > > > drew > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > > Linux-audio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > !DSPAM:4a13023a181125312211103! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
