On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Esben Stien wrote: > > My needs are professional, ergo I do not need or want Pulseaudio. > > I just can't see this as an issue, cause it's not;). Pulse runs as a > JACK client. End of story;). I'll decide for myself if something is an issue or not, and I don't need any big brother to do that in my place. - I don't want desktop sounds. - I only use audio apps that talk to jack and then only those that behave. - I don't need PulseAudio, and don't want it, not even as a jack client. It's useless for me and someday it's going to do something I don't like. So where do you get the idea that PulseAudio should be forced down everybody's throat ? If I don't need and want a TV, not even a free one, are you going to say me I must have one at home because most people want one ? Any good reason why PulseAudio is not installed as a service that can be enabled/disabled as seen fit by the user, just as almost all system components ? Ciao, -- FA Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
