Garry Ogle wrote: > Julien Claassen wrote: >> You're right. But a couple of us have tried and it didn't work. We might do a >> kind of a petition and send him a kind plea with the petitioners names attached. >> Might that help? I've heard it, it sounds great. Kindest regards Julien >> > > Hi, Julien. Did you succeed in contacting this guy and he refused? Or couldn't you > make contact? When was that? > > I love the sounds on his samples! You can have my name on that petition! His license includes a reason it's not open source: > 1. LICENSE - PLEASE READ > > YOU MAY FREELY DOWNLOAD AND INSTALL A COPY OF THE SOFTWARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE. > YOU MAY NOT BUNDLE, RENAME, SELL, REDISTRIBUTE, REPACKAGE OR IN ANY OTHER WAY ALTER > WHOLE OR PART OF THE SOFTWARE AND ITS DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT PRIOR, EXPRESS AND > WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AUTHOR. > > The purpose of this rather restrictive license is simple: I do not want multiple > versions splitting off with my name in them when the program is still under > development. If you feel that you would like to make a serious contribution to the > project, please contact me. Note the last sentence. It sounds like he'd be more open to community development than forking his code. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
