Re: state of multimedia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 07 May 2009 08:04:27 +0700
Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> Jack is included in fedora core IIUC so I have no idea why anyone
> >> would compile mplayer without jack support.
> >>     
> >
> > Why not ask them?  I imagine you'd find either some bug, or they
> > wanted to promote some other audio interface, or they've made it an
> > optional package.
> >
> >   
> 
> There are no major bugs with jack and mplayer has had working jack 
> support for over 5 years now. If it's a political decision then
> that's a pretty big call to make. I didn't find any optional packages
> with yum search.

In my experience mplayer and the likes is compiled without jack support
on almost any distro, I guess mainly because jack is a pretty
specialised application. Most users of mplayer won't need it, most
packagers won't know it. It's as simple as that.

--Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux