Dan S wrote: > Maybe your softwares support load-sharing over multiple processors (a > good thing, no?) and therefore all the work is being neatly divided > between the processors. Any reason that should be bad? No, what would be great. Unfortunately I'm pretty that's not what's happening. With the same patch I can run 35 (but not 40) voices in ams on dual core and 45 (but not 50) with one core disabled: http://atte.dk/download/ams_dual_poly35.png http://atte.dk/download/ams_single_poly35.png http://atte.dk/download/ams_single_poly40.png So performance is (or seems to me, not knowing much about the inner working of neither a dualcore cpu or linux multicore implementation to be) slightly better with one core. -- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
