Re: Running Status v.s "Ordinary" Status and MIDI merging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Crypto wrote:
> I am currently using two external MIDI devices that connect to my notebook via 
> an external USB MIDI adaptor (a nice Edirol UM2).
> [...]
> And now there is a problem: as I have connected the two devices to the IN port 
> the application (or the driver of the MIDI port) has to do MIDI merging. But 
> something is wrong with the merging, if the running status device's data 
> bytes have to be merged with the second device's data stream.

Please note that neither the USB MIDI protocol nor ALSA's sequencer
messages can use running status.

That IN port is an ALSA sequencer port, isn't it?

Does the data look correct when you view it with aseqdump?

> 1.) Which part is actually responsible for the MIDI merging of two or more 
> output devices into one input device? Is it the driver of the port or is it 
> the application, that is in the end receiving the MIDI data stream?

Each ALSA sequencer input port has a queue of messages; ALSA
automatically puts messages into this queue in the correct order.

> 2.) Is it illegal to connect two output devices to one input port?

No.

> 3.) If I should need some kind of virtual MIDI multiplexing/demultiplexing 
> driver: which one should I chose?

Connecting one port to several other ports works without a separate
device.

In certain situations, you might want to use the MIDI Through device.


Best regards,
Clemens
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux