On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
personally speaking, i would avoid this card. even though the RME products that came after this are, in my opinion, peerless, this one came before RME really understood how to do PCI bus-mastering. as a result it is an inefficient h/w design that requires the device driver to do a bunch of work that in the digi9652 and everything that followed was done by the hardware. i am sure that the sound quality is good, probably even a little better than the m-audio but certainly comparable - its just not up the same internal design specs as RME's later products.
Hi,
What do you guys think of the RME Digi96/8 PAD pci pro? How is the card
compared to an maudio delta 66 for example?
personally speaking, i would avoid this card. even though the RME products that came after this are, in my opinion, peerless, this one came before RME really understood how to do PCI bus-mastering. as a result it is an inefficient h/w design that requires the device driver to do a bunch of work that in the digi9652 and everything that followed was done by the hardware. i am sure that the sound quality is good, probably even a little better than the m-audio but certainly comparable - its just not up the same internal design specs as RME's later products.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
