Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> As some of you know, I've had nothing but trouble with Ubuntu's rt >> kernel, specifically 2.6.27-3-rt from the current repos. As a result >> I've been working in non-realtime, and I'm not happy about it. >> ... >> > > I guess I could use a little more info before I even suggest a path > for you to take. when you say the "Ubuntu rt kernel" is this just the > standard rt kernel but supplied by Ubuntu, or is this an Ubuntu kernel > (i.e. - a kernel.org kernel patched with Ubuntu patches) and then > further patched with the rt stuff? > Hi Mark, According to its Synaptic entry the 2.6.27-3-rt kernel is built from the 2.6.27 sources with Ingo Molnar's patch for 2.6.25.5-rt9. > My #1 suggestion is to make sure you are just using the standard rt > kernel. I had a bit of trouble with 2.6.25-rt so I stayed with 2.6.24 > for a while and just recently moved to 2.6.26.8-rt12 which is working > fine for me but did require that I reconfigure it from scratch instead > of using make oldconfig so building it was a little more painful. It's > working well though. > > I don't mind the configuration, even though it's been a while. I can hack it. :) > I guess it's just me but I don't understand the motivation for > running the newest rt kernel. I upgrade every 2-3 major kernel > revisions these days, or when I hear about a major bug, security > issue, etc. I used 2.6.21, 24 and now 26. > > I'll be pleased to have *any* working rt kernel on this system. Btw, will I still need the LAU list patch for ALSA ? Best, dp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
