Re: Bpm detection/quantize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:53:07PM -0200, surian wrote:

> hey, why such anger Fons?

It's not anger, and don't take my comments personally.
 
> I really don't see it as a defect (it's just a fact).
> The music is beautiful and makes me want to use it.

Re-using music, or parts of it, is probably as old as 
music itself, and until music became very big business
(it was business before, but not in that way), people
were usually honoured when it happened as long as the
result was  attributed to the original composer.

But. Adding a ostinate beat to music that was never
designed to have such a beat has IMHO never produced
anything of value. In the best case it creates an
effect of 'alienation', but it's an effect, no more.
Which means it's surprising the first time, much less
so the second, and just boring from the third time you
hear it. 

> If you don't like that people remix <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remix>
> the others work what you think of linux?

I don't see the relation.

-- 
FA

Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux