Ray Rashif <schivmeister@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Shouldn't there be an '-I/usr/include' appearing above? > > Yes, there should be nothing "local" in the Makefile if you do a search. > Most probably pkg-config isn't right, but this should not happen in Debian. > Paths aren't the problem here, though. Try: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr \ > --without-jack-dbus > > I've read there's a problem with jack1+dbus. Sorry I can't be of more > qualified help, but an e-mail to a Debian package maintainer, lash and jack > dev will definitely shed light. LASH using jack1+dbus is indeed not good combination. But I doubt the compilation problem is related to this. Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Could there be a JACK version problem? LASH expects > jack_version > 0.99, but the latest JACK I have is 0.116. > I had just hacked that part: > > MISSING_REQUIRED=" JACK >= 0.1" So you disabled a check against jack2. I think lash was working with jack1 in dbus-less mode but I havent tested it much. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Attachment:
pgp1YS5VcboiD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
