On 1/16/09, Cassiel <raffaele.morelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi you all, > > I am trying to compile a RT kernel after the recent fix by Adam Samson but > probably I am missing something. > > I have saved this content in a text file (adam_patch) > > --- linux-2.6.26/kernel/softirq.c_orig 2009-01-04 14:41:06.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux-2.6.26/kernel/softirq.c 2009-01-04 14:41:49.000000000 +0000 > @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ > local_irq_disable(); > list = __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).head; > __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).head = NULL; > - __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).tail = &__get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).head; > + __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).tail = &__get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).head; > local_irq_enable(); > > __tasklet_action(a, list); > > but when tryin to apply the patch... > > agf:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26# patch -p1 -i adam_patch > patching file kernel/softirq.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 657. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/softirq.c.rej One thing you could do to find out the reason for the failure is to see if the seven lines starting at line 657 in softirq.c are indeed what the patch file (minus the line starting with '+', and the '-' sign at the beginning of the previous line) contains. If so, you could even try to manually change __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).tail = &__get_cpu_var(tasklet_vec).head; to __get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).tail = &__get_cpu_var(tasklet_hi_vec).head; If not, then you're dealing with the source of a different version of the kernel. But even then, you may still find the above line nearby (perhaps in a slightly different context) and try to change it. HTH Andras _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
