On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 01:03:48PM +0100, hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:13:38 +0100 > torbenh@xxxxxx wrote: > But is the lossy codec (celt) a good idea for a LAN? of course its not. i was talking about wireless here, which is losing packets, and celt can compensate for packet loss. celt-0.6.0 at 512kbit/s should be the way to go for such setups. i dont think that the quality reduction, will be audible, at such bitrate. And the packet losses would only degrade quality, but thats better than clicks and pops due to lost packets. -- torben Hohn http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
