Hi, >> * So the problem was seq24 on the slave machine was running at this own >> tempo. If the master use 120BPM and the Slave 110, they are not >> synchronized. But if you put 120 on both, it seems to be synchronized... >> Well I think there is a bug in seq24 or something. I didn't try with other >> softwares. But I have some doubt about the real tempo synchronization. > > as stated, it only synchronizes the framecount. > netjack2 seems to do complete tempo synchronisation, but i dont know > if its latency compensated. and i also had somebody reporting, > that it just fails with an assert triggered. > are you running on 64bit? Still no tempo sync, but the new release of seq24 fixes this: [...] Fixed Bugs * Fixed BPM saving on 64 bit platforms." [...] Have a look at this post: http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--seq24-0.9.0-%28Rejoicing-Rika%29-is-out-td20740927.html ) best, d _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
