there is a patch for 2.6.27 avaluable here: http://opensource1.windriver.com/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=people/paulg/rt/patches I dont have test them for now I stay with 2.6.25.9-rt7 regards hermann Am Donnerstag, den 27.11.2008, 16:56 +1100 schrieb porl sheean: > i haven't had any real problems with 2.6.26 RT patches, but i don't > use my midi gear in linux (waiting for ardour 3 branch to mature a bit > more first). is there any reason the 2.6.26 patch hasn't been ported > forward to 2.6.27? are the changes that prominent that the patch is > too difficult to port? i remember the last few releases (24, 25 and > 26) didn't take too long before a (albeit preliminary) patch was > available, but i have found nothing at all for 27. i'd like to update > this machine to intrepid but i want to make sure i'm not going > backwards in terms of rt support (i know i can use the older kernel > i'm using now, but it kinda defeats the purpose of upgrading then). i > noticed there is a 2.6.27-rt package in intrepid actually, what is > this if the rt patches aren't available yet? > > sorry to ramble > > porl > > 2008/11/27 <torbenh@xxxxxx>: > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 03:45:45PM -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > >> > >> In both cases you will need a working Jack and you will need to run it > >> with realtime priority (which has nothing to do with the realtime > >> preemption patches). > > > > the rumor i am concerned about, is, that you need an RT kernel to run > > jackd. > > > > can people stop saying this please ? > > > > -- > > torben Hohn > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
