Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Pieter Palmers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The FFADO team is proud to announce the first release candidate for >> FFADO 2.0. >> >> This release candidate is intended to collect feedback about the library >> under wide-spread usage. The code should be free of major bugs. >> >> We are looking for packagers that are interested in creating packages >> for their favorite distribution. Please contact us if you can help us >> out with this. >> >> Release and download information: >> http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/rc1 >> >> Currently, the installation options are: >> * manual build from source >> [http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/rc1] >> * semi-automatic build from source into a 'sandbox' >> [http://subversion.ffado.org/wiki/SandboxInstalls] >> * APT repository for Ubuntu Gutsy and Hardy (possibly others) >> [http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/apt] >> >> Please test and report issues at our TRAC at http://subversion.ffado.org/ >> or at the mailing list (ffado-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). Please take >> note of http://subversion.ffado.org/wiki/WritingGoodTickets when >> reporting bugs. >> >> We ask all users of FreeBoB that are not yet testing FFADO to try this >> release candidate. Note that FFADO can co-exist with FreeBoB without any >> problems, so you can revert back to your original setup very easily. >> >> Enjoy, >> >> Pieter Palmers >> ffado.org >> >> _ > > Thanks. > > It would be more logic imho if there will be a apt repo for Hardy > instead of Gutsy... Hardy is more recent and an LTS version... Indeed. But I still run gutsy, which is why I built gutsy packages. I would be glad to setup a hardy/intrepid/... repo, but it's not easy if you don't have it installed. Is it? Pieter _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
