Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > Matthew Smith wrote: > > Just out of interest, what - if any - are the pros and cons of > > Rosegarden versus Qtractor? For myself, as an unsophisticated user, is > > Qtractor (as it appears) all I'll ever need? > > major qtractor cons;) > > - no tempo/key-signature map > - no score/notation editor > - no automation > - no plugin latency/delay compensation > > however these are all features that will be addressed in the future > (except score/notation; that won't happen sorry:) Rosegarden's notation view is one feature of this program that I could not give up. I have been also a Cakewalk/Sonar user under windows for a long time, using it's staff view a lot. In both programs I don't use the notation view as a score desktop publishing engine, because a real score editor needs many features that these programs lack. But it may be a very nice representation of MIDI tracks, if you record the MIDI tracks with a metronome, or create it from scratch. It is not that I dislike the piano-roll representations, but I feel much more comfortable with the score for visual inspection of the music. I can locate very quickly where I've made a mistake without having to press the play button. That's because I'm very used to scores, of course. Regards, Pedro _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
