hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:41:07 +0100 > <hollunder@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:45:42 +0700 >> Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have adjusted the sample rate for a couple of tracks and added a >>> couple more that I missed from the original release. >>> >>> The mix is now 100 minutes long. Still no Hiphop tracks and no >>> classical pieces either. >>> >>> http://djcj.org/audio/lam/lam-2008.ogg >>> 112,379MB - ogg >>> >>> - If people can have a listen and let me know if the levels are >>> right that would be helpful. It sounds fine on my headphones but >>> may be too quiet at the start on a speaker system. >>> >>> - I have compressed it with q5 this time. That makes the file size >>> about 40MB bigger. The previous version was q3 which is the default >>> for oggenc. Please let me know if that improves the audio quality. >>> >>> >>> Here's the full playlist: >>> >> It would be nice to have that available in the file somehow. >> I know that it's possible with vorbis, I just don't know how. >> > > Excuse me for replying to myself. > > I found out how to do it, it's as simple as: > > cat song1.ogg song2.ogg song3.ogg > song123.ogg > > The problem is that very few players handle it in an acceptable way, > and none that I tried showed the tag of anything but the first file, so > it's a no-go, unfortunately. > > Sadly, the only player I know of that handles this correctly is still > foobar2k, a proprietary player for windows. It works in wine but that's > no use really.. > > > I will make a version of the mix with seperate tracks for the final copy. I can cut it up with markers in ardour IIUC. >> And another thing, usually the recommended ogg encoder is the >> aoTuV-version which one can get here as .deb for example: >> http://rarewares.org/ogg-oggenc.php >> Afaik the aoTuV-changes are going to be merged into mainline oggenc, >> I don't know if this has already happened. >> Benefits should be: faster, same or better quality vs. filesize >> > > I just heard from a dev that normal oggenc should be fine as long as > one doesn't go below 80kbps. > > > One thing about levels: they are imho not optimal. One thing you could > try: wavgain a copy of the files (trackgain), make the vorbis file and > check if the levels are fine. theoretically it should work reasonably > well. > > I'm not sure what you mean hear. Can you give me a bit more detail please? > Best regards, > Philipp > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
