major qtractor cons;)
- no tempo/key-signature map- no score/notation editor
- no automation- no plugin latency/delay compensation
Does Rosegarden have Automation yet?
or are you listing general cons
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Matthew Smith wrote:
> Quoth James Cameron at 2008-11-12 18:58...
>
>> Quick summary of the difference ... Rosegarden has notation editing,if by matrix editor is what someone else names a piano-roll editor, then
>> score production, a matrix editor, a percussion matrix editor, a MIDI
>> event editor, segments that can be triggered by others. Qtractor lacks
>> these, or I could not find them. Do you need them? It depends on how
>> important they are to your workflow.
> None of these are really too important, although the matrix editing
> would be handy. But I can overcome that by using Hydrogen - I have no
> issues with using more than one bit of software at a time. After all, I
> used to do this with LOTS of hardware.
>
qtractor also has it: it's called "midi clip editor" there :)
byee
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
