On Monday 03 November 2008 16:08:05 Nils Gey wrote: > Ok. > > You see, I'm still not sure about the license and I'm glad there is a > mailinglist to discuss such things. Maybe I will just forbid commercial at > all. Sharing is one thing but giving the music away so that others can make > money with it is another. Or maybe I do it like the GPL and whoever sells > my music is forced to announce that you can download it for free :) (just a > joke) Actually, that is about what I do. The license I use is one of the cc BY-SA ones. A lot like the GPL but for music and other art, etc. I wish people would start trying to make money selling my stuff. It would be nice if they shared some of the wealth if they made a bunch but right now, moving my stuff would be a nice start. I do have some ideas I am documenting on how to make something if you want to while using Free Licenses for various artworks. Here is a link: http://packet-in.org/wiki/index.php?title=Income In any case, here are some of my lyrics and bits of lyrics: http://packet-in.org/repo/user_drewRoberts/drewRoberts_newlyrics.txt You are free to try and make something money wise from them so long as you follow the license terms. > > Nils all the best, drew > > > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:02:20 -0500 > > drew Roberts <zotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday 03 November 2008 15:03:17 Nils Gey wrote: > > > I meant radio-broadcasting" or disco/festival-playback with > > > "commercial". > > > > I still don't think I get it. When you say with "commercial", do you mean > > in a commercial setting? One where they are earning money as a result of > > playing your music and perhaps that of others? > > > > If that is the case, you do realise that that is almost no different than > > allowing them to sell it. > > > > > I just don't want that people take my songs and sell them on their own > > > CDs or in Internet stores. > > > > In any case, I know of no license that fits this bill so you will likely > > need a custom crafted license and a place that is willing to host such > > for you. Of course, someone else may know of such a license. > > > > drew > > > > > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:39:59 -0500 > > > > > > drew Roberts <zotz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Monday 03 November 2008 13:40:22 Nils Gey wrote: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > > > After my little Album is sold out I want to give it away for free > > > > > now. I will choose one of the CC licenses I think so that people > > > > > can share,download, listen, play-back (even commercial) to it > > > > > unlimited and free of charge but that they are prohibited to > > > > > change, remix, rent or sell it. > > > > > > > > > > Now I want to share with a big audience so do you know any sites > > > > > and places where I can share under the terms I've mentioned before? > > > > > > > > Your terms are confusing. I would think sharing something in a > > > > commercial fashion is close enough to either renting or selling it > > > > that I can't figure out exactly what you are getting at. > > > > > > > > If you can satisfy yourself with cc BY-SA as a license, then the > > > > internet archive will host for you. > > > > > > > > > Nils > > > > > > > > all the best, > > > > > > > > drew > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
