On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 19:13 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > Paul Davis wrote: > > The test that Olivier has written is essentially a no-op on a > > uniprocessor x86 system, because there are no cache coherency issues. > > The code *is* thread safe on a uniprocessor because of the logic above, > > not because we rely on instruction reordering/memory barrier processor > > behaviour. > > i haven't thought much about this issue, but the fact that i got a > failure on an uniprocessor athlon64 seems to contradict your statement: in which case i should shut up now, since this implies that i don't know enough about what is going on here. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
