On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 13:25 -0400, Sean Corbett wrote: > This is probably just a way-out-there nobody-will-take-the-time idea, > but has anyone ever thought of splitting the mixer part of Ardour from > the DAW part? So that e.g. if you do strictly outboard mixing, you > don't need to fire up Ardour's mixer, or more importantly, if all you > need is a mixer and plugin-patch-points (as Alex does), you can fire > up Ardour's mixer standalone? this idea is based on a misconception about how ardour works internally. "mixing" is 100% the same as the basic signal processing that occurs on every "signal processing route" (known to users as tracks & busses). you can't "separate" this from mixing, but you don't have to have the editor involved at all. if you want ardour as just a mixer, you create a session with only busses, then you hide the editor window and show just the mixer. et voila. --p _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
