Re: LA-documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Arnold Krille wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 23. September 2008 schrieb Christoph Eckert:
>   
>> Phew, you're damn right. Maybe you'll be the first one who puts the things
>> you earned into some wiki page for documentation purposes :) .
>>     
>
> Not another one...
>
> *Please* have a look at the documentation wikis/projects for linux audio out 
> there (especially the ones on *.linuxaudio.org) before creating yet another 
> one.
>
> Arnold
I'm a long way from the understanding I would need to write it up, but 
Fons' post was a big step. I'll need to ask some more questions. The 
last thing I would want to do is fragment the Linux audio info any more 
- the current state has made it really difficult to find accurate, 
non-outdated info. Every search gives you five answers, all different. 
Even the UbuntuStudio wiki which started with great enthusiasm a year or 
so ago is now outdated and incorrect. I suppose it's logical that audio 
people would rather be creating than documenting, but I think the lack 
of an authoritative, reliably up-to-date documentation has made Linux 
audio inaccessible to many.

Fritz

Fritz


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux