Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 schrieb James Stone: > What I don't quite understand is that Qt has a free/commercial > separate licensing, but no-one has the same kind of problem with qt > that they have with LS? Would someone care to explain? No one??? You surely are funny! What do you think why gnome was founded??? Not because Qt wasn't free, but because Qt wasn't free enough. Kind of like the same as with LS/Eisenkraut/etc. not being free enough. BTW: If libgig is truly free, why don't we use it to integrate gig-support into fluidsynth? Have fun, Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
