Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2008 schrieb Roberto Gordo Saez: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:54:45PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: > > Well, I am not a lawyer. A while back I tried to get a lawyers opinion to > > making some source open source but that lead to three different answer > > (from that one guy) so I waited until I was not employed there anymore > > but still working on that project... > > But what I learned is: You need to state the copyright-holders of each > > file in the file. Otherwise it definitely gets lost (it can still "get > > lost" but that leads to legal action). And you should state the license. > Hmmm... I suggest you to find another lawyers, seriously!!! please do! Well, I kind of got a new lawyer. As I said I am still working on the same (university) project writing the same code, but before I was paid by an external research institute (who collaborate with the university on this project) and he had so many things he wanted to check, that I waited until I wasn't paid by them anymore but by the university itself. And then my Prof. (the project-leader) and I decided to make the software open source las we had intended from the very beginning... And the source-files state the project with its collaborationists as copyright-holder, the names of the people working on it and a clear statement that its licensed under (L)GPLv3 and the license-text is in the tarball. Should be okay... Have fun, Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
