Am Montag 15 September 2008 schrieb Darren Landrum: > Florian Schmidt wrote: > > Well basically you tell the configure script to add a string "no" to every > > build line.. Then of course g++ tries to compile a file called "no". Which is > > probably not what you want.. > > So why did it work before? Some kind of environment difference? > > If I want to tell configure not to compile any of the Vamp stuff, how > would I do it? > > I ask not just because I want to avoid Vamp for now, but because my last > experience with compiling Vamp went very, very poorly. It was all > documented on this list. > > Someway, somehow, I was once able to tell Rubber Band not to compile its > Vamp plug-in examples. Are you really sure you used "no" as argument for these variables? they come from pkgconfig usually and contain paths and/or options, or are empty if the package in question isn't installed. Try ./configure Vamp_CFLAGS= Vamp_LIBS= This seems to have the desired effect here, although Vamp is installed and detected by ./configure, the g++ lines look like this later: g++ -DHAVE_FFTW3 -DFFTW_DOUBLE_ONLY -DNO_THREAD_CHECKS -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Irubberband -Isrc -c -o src/AudioCurve.o src/AudioCurve.cpp > > Thanks for the help. > > Regards, > Darren Landrum > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > Edgar |
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user