David Baron wrote: > > A while back, someone was working a a minimalist scoring program, gcomposer I > think he called it. His syntax was very close to MUPs idea. He was not The original noteedit program used a mup-lilke syntax. I even managed to import/export a few simple pieces (just playing around stuff). The new program nted uses a text file which appears to represent the gui display much more than the music (which probably makes lots of sense). BTW, nted is a program which I've give a go and it appears to have lots of promise. > interested in a full repertoire of music symbols, however. But a GUI for MUP > in the making. it certainly could be. Do you folks really think a gui is important for this kind of stuff? I know that I am very happy doing mup (and mma) stuff with a text editor. I have used a number of GUI interfaces for music and find they just slow me down or get in my way. With a program like mup (or lily) one can have an editor in a window and do repetitive compiles/displays in a separate window (or in emacs, in the same). And with fast CPUs which are so common today it is very fast to do. Maybe I'm just showing my age :) -- **** Listen to my CD at http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** EMAIL: bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
