hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > Maybe I give something like sidux a whirl as well. studio64 doesn't > appeal to me, since using debian-stable, the system in general is not > very up-to-date. Normally it isn't recommend to have a mixed Debian based system. When you use stable (as 64studio) does, you can use backports. But mixing stable with testing is asking for troubles. Mixing Debian testing with unstable isn't recommend either by the Debian devs, but works way better then mixing stable with testing. It gives you the advantage that you are able keep almost every package up to date (you have to do it sometimes by hand, cause also in unstable the audio packages are not always up to date). I use it now for a while and have good experiences with it: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=15612 Sidux is another solution for it, already mentioned. If there was a version of 64studio based on Debian testing, it would be much more easy to keep audio packages up to date in my view (you're able to mix it with some unstable packages). And you know the newest packages fixes in general some bugs and add new features which are most of the time very useful... Maybe an idea for the 64studio devs? Regards, _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
