Re: A Linux Audio distro that can keep up?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Samstag, 30. August 2008 00:18:19 schrieb Darren Landrum:

>
> I'm beginning to suspect that it's impossible to keep an audio distro up
> to date, and that I'll have to do it manually. Arch64 has a great
> system, but their precompiled binaries are very vanilla, and the user
> "experience" felt very patched together. It was a chore to do very basic
> things, like access my DVD-R (it could only do so in root).
>
> I love how polished Ubuntu is, but keeping some software packages up to
> date is a chore. I don't think I'm getting around it, though. I just
> wish I could figure out why I can't compile vamp-sdk, or why it is I
> need that to compile Rubber Band to begin with.
>
> I think what I'm going to do is make a list of software to remove from
> my system, and then simply keep up on that software manually, and hope I
> can keep it all working.
>
> -- Darren

I am realy happy with sidux. It's allway's up to date (rolling release) and I  
never have a prob with compile the app I wont. Also the rt-kernel is allways 
up to date. 

regards   hermann
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux