General perfrmance question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi everyone!
   I just fooled around with LinuxSampler and ecasound, my favourite recording 
tool. And I wonder:
is a system with 512M of memory and a 2.8gHz supposed to handle a running LS 
and recording at the same time. When I stress LS alone (no recording started) 
I can get it up to about 20-28% CPU usage and memory usage of LS was 82%. 
There's no GUI on my system and not much else which is eating at the CPU and 
memory. The other CPU costs are minimal, estimate of 4-6%.
   If that kind of system is supposed to handel my demands, I should look for 
troublemakers, because LS gave me glitches while recording.
   Kindest regards
         Julien

--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)

======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux