On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Justin Smith <noisesmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Arthur <arthura@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Roger E wrote: > > > Another happy Amarok user here. I always fix the tags with Easytag > > > before adding them to the collection. With proper tags the search works > > > perfectly. Easytag can fetch tags from cddb also, and rename files from > > > tags. > > > If only Amarok had a replay gain function like fb2k I reckon it would be > > > perfect. It does take over half an hour to scan my 10000 tracks, but > > > hey, you only need to do that once. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > > > > > I also think that amarok is great, but I have a very fast computer. I > > don't fix tags with easytag (but I do think that it's a great program), > > I rip with rubyripper and everything is ready to dump into my music > > folder as is. If you folks don't know about rubyripper, please check it > > out. I found out about it when I was running archlinux and I hope that > > there are binaries for every distro soon. No, I am not affiliated with > > rubyripper in any way. > > > > Enjoy, > > Arthur > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > > From the wikipedia page for the program: > > One has to wonder though: can 3 bytes actually be heard in a wav file > that produces 180.000 bytes per second? > > The answer is a definitive yes, and if you are (un)lucky, they may > just blow your speakers too. And I presume by 180,000 bytes per second > they mean 176,400. > > Since it is a ruby application, presumably it wouldn't even be > possible to have a binary for it if you wanted one (or is it mixed > ruby/c?). > > It does look like an interesting application, but their alogorithms > are either very naively implemented or the wikipedia page explains > them poorly. > oops, meant to send that to the list _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
