On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 12:14 -0400, Joshua D. Boyd wrote: > When I tried it, my system fell to pieces, and I was unable to figure > out how to tune it back to working in a reasonable amount of time (say > 40 hours). So I've been sticking with SCHED_FIFO without Ingo's RT > patches. At least this way things basically work with enough buffering. > Although somehow regular priority threads (and processes) still manage > to interfere with my SCHED_FIFO threads. They can do that if they use syscalls that run for a long time in the kernel without getting pre-empted. The whole point of the RT patch is to make those kernel code paths shorter. --ll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
