Re: Realtime Kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
> An -rt kernel will be more robust in those cases, and also
> gives you the tools to optimize your system by assigning
> interrupt handling priorities. The result is that you can
> have lower latencies.

Unfortunately this comes at a price:
During development it is way easier to lock your system when you use an rt 
kernel. Because the amoc-running process with realtime-priority gets all the 
processing time it wants, it can be _very_ hard to get the system to react to 
keyboard/mouse or network-ssh to get it back under control...
Of course this isn't really an issue for the mere user.

Arnold
-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux