Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 schrieb Svend-Erik Madsen: > What's all the fuzz about latency ? I don't know. But most "fuzz-makers" become silent when you tell them that linux can breach the 5ms-latency-border. :-) Because most people of the outside-tech-world think that you need to have "zero latency" which translates to "10ms or less". So 5ms (even with my old on-board soundcard) really shuts them off. > I use an RME Multiface and my setup has round 5ms latency also, and I > can play my guitar together with all other instruments on the computer > without any bad time feeling at all, and it's really only a problem when > you use one or more outputs for monitoring, and your latency exceeds > 10ms. But if I use my amp for monitoring during recording, my experience > is that latency is no issue at all. You might even be able to play through it up to 20ms latency, After that it gets difficult if you aren't a classical organist (these people are used to play with half a second of latency). Doing live FOH mixing or playing keys/instruments on/through the computer really needs low latency, where "low" means 10ms or less. For recording on the other hand you can use higher latencies because the good recording solutions can sync it up internally so that what you record gets aligned to what you (should) hear at that time. And with recording higher latencies gives you more cpu-cycles for disk-io... Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
