Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2008 schrieb david: > Arnold Krille wrote: > > Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 schrieb Dave Phillips: > >> Obviously the memory handling capacity is much greater on the 64-bit > >> machine, and I expect that we'll all be running 64-bit boxes eventually. > > No, 32bit and 1GB of ram ought to be enough for everybody! > 32-bit + 2GB RAM would be enough for me to handle stitching large > panoramic photos ... don't know about how it would help audio work. The more ram the better for audio! Loading big soundfonts is easier with more ram (try loading a 3gig piano-font into 1gig of ram). Caching more audio-tracks is easier with more ram (and thus gives you more cycles available for effects)... RAM can't be substituted by anything else then RAM! (DE: Frei nach "Hubraum ist durch nichts zu ersetzen als Hubraum.") And that "ought to be enough for everybody" is a funny reference. Like that famous (incorrect citation) "I think the world will be saturated with 5 computers." Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
