On Thursday 24 January 2008 10:02:03 Matthias Schönborn wrote: > I realised that when using 128 Frames per Period instead of 64, it works > perfectly. At least it did for like three hours yesterday evening. It's a > great tool for composing, I think! > > See below for the output. Thanks for your report. I've just released klick 0.6, containing the fix for this crash, and many other JACK transport related improvements. http://das.nasophon.de/klick/ Dominic > (gdb) thread apply all bt > > Thread 2 (process 5965): > #0 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () > #1 0xb7d05e96 in nanosleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > #2 0xb7d3fb3c in usleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > #3 0x0804ab80 in Klick::run (this=0x807a008) at klick.cc:174 > #4 0x0804a8bb in main (argc=8, argv=0xbffc1784) at main.cc:39 > > Thread 1 (process 5968): > #0 0x08051ce6 in AudioInterface::process_mix_samples (this=0x807a138, > dest=0xb7c24000, src=0x807b8f8, > length=2122, volume=1) at audio_interface.cc:197 > #1 0x08051ef2 in AudioInterface::process_mix (this=0x807a138, > buffer=0xb7c13a00, nframes=64) > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- > at audio_interface.cc:181 > #2 0x08051ff9 in AudioInterface::process_callback_ (nframes=64, > arg=0x807a138) at audio_interface.cc:139 > #3 0xb7f81f09 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libjack.so.0 > #4 0x00000040 in ?? () > #5 0x0807a138 in ?? () > #6 0x000003e8 in ?? () > #7 0x00000003 in ?? () > #8 0x00000000 in ?? () _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
