hi c im also always confused with legal stuff concerning art but my oppinion is: if their project is commercial and they make money with it i think you should also get some money to (if you want it so) on your current license it says: "Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes." except if author (you) allows it. my point is - it is your work and you can do with it whatever you want correct me if im wrong greets nikola Cesare Marilungo wrote: > I received an email from a film producer (based in Los Angeles, probably > an indie studio) in which he wrote that the director of a movie they're > just finishing (they're at post-production stage) is interested in using > two tracks of mine, 'Balloon' (http://www.cesaremarilungo.com/media) and > 'As we grow older' (http://www.cesaremarilungo.com/media/the-moon-ep). > > I released these tracks under a non-commercial Creative Commons license: > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed-music. > > In the past some of my music has been used for some short films, but > these were clearly non commercial projects or film schools thesis. > > Has anybody some experience on this topic? What should I do? Should I > re-license these tracks? Can I just make them a written permission? Or > should I ask for some kind of royalty (or would it be ridiculous, also > considering that AFAIK Gyorgy Ligeti has never been paid for its music > on '2001 A space odyssey' :-) )? > > Thanks in advance, > > - c. > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
