Re: Timestretch without sample damage.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Timestretch without sample damage.
From: Sebastian Tschöpel <tschoseb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:28:10 +0100
Cc: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200801031725.34067.arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031)

> Guess why Cris Cannam is taking part in this thread...

mkay.... got it.

- sebastian
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

References:
- Re: Timestretch without sample damage.
  - From: J M Needham
- Re: Timestretch without sample damage.
  - From: Sebastian Tschöpel
- Re: Timestretch without sample damage.
  - From: Arnold Krille

Prev by Date: Re: Timestretch without sample damage.
Next by Date: Re: Resonance
Previous by thread: Re: Timestretch without sample damage.
Next by thread: X, gnome-panel, jackd, ardour/rosegarden weirdness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [Pulse Audio] [ALSA Devel] [Sox Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Photo Sharing] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux