On Mi, 12.12.07 16:11 "Rui Nuno Capela" <rncbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, December 12, 2007 15:51, Chris Cannam wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:10, gimpel wrote: > > > >> Could you please rename the tarball on sourceforge to .gz or > >> upload a real .bz2? > >> > > > > Several people have asked me this. Apologies for the mistake; I've > > uploaded a real .bz2 now, to replace the bz2 with a gz extension I > > originally uploaded. > > > > While I'm grateful to have the error caught, I'm intrigued as to > > why so many people thought this was important enough to write an > > email about -- why would anyone really care? Surely anyone > > prepared to build this from source is capable of unpacking an > > archive that happens to have the wrong extension? Am I missing > > something? > > > > have you considered automated packaging into your equation? gentoo > comes to mind, but i'm not a gentooer :) > > cheers That's exactly why I asked for a new tarball.. I want to update the Gentoo ebuild in our pro-audio overlay, and portage doesn't simply use tar xvf, but bunzip2 && tar x For sure affects other source based meta-distros too. Thanks for the new tarball! Regards, Tom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
