Hello Chris, > And sadly I only have eight > hands and three heads and there are only 132 hours in the day. At first: lol. Secondly, I really appreciate your work and I would never complain about anything concerning your dedication or how fast some tool gets developed. > Your remark about the unhelpfulness of comparing Rosegarden with Cubase > arrived on the same day that we removed an introductory note that made that > comparison from the Rosegarden website. I wanted to pick up that exact sentence as an example and I was glad to see that you removed it. > Although it's sometimes helpful as a > quick answer to "what the hell is this program with this meaningless name > supposed to be for?" A quick "an open-source audio/midi sequencer & score editor" would be enough. In my oppinion. This way, you don't get in trouble being compared to such a tool like Cubase, since this is like comparing apples and oranges. > A related point is that stronger "competition" might also have been > beneficial. [...] But > it's more important to maintain your own interest by doing the things you > really want to see done. I cannot say anything about that, but I think this thought is very interesting. Thanks for you comment. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
