Le Vendredi, 7 Décembre 2007 23:56:35 +0000,Folderol <folderol@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > No, the first three chords from the original demo started me off,> and I quite liked the expression in the snippet. After that it took> on a life of its own :) It's kind of nice, but it is soooo 4/4. And I mean that 5/4 wouldn'tbe better. Or any other time signature. The intent turned out morelike a nightmare for software that tries to print out music on a staff,so to speak. Fuzziness, or muddiness would be more like it. Overwhich a melody could come and go. Perhaps on a wind instrument. Onthe low side, the bass could be using a mix of harmonics and soft lownotes. Things would evolve rather quickly (must not forget about shortattention span ! ;-) so that percussion could reing in. And perhapssustaining from a guitar, leading to a definite and different melodythat would state the meaning. And then fade away into the magma (*).Or something like that. But not too 4/4 oriented, although your bitwith the highs and low is nice. Cheers, Al (*) pun on the actual band: http://youtube.com/watch?v=3PctfRFnn6ghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magma_(band)http://www.seventhrecords.com/ _______________________________________________Linux-audio-user mailing listLinux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
