On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 00:08 -0800, David Griffith wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, david wrote: > > > Well, I think that Yamaha's sound patches in their hardware synthesizers > > sound much better than any soundfont I've heard. But if you're talking > > about a pure synthesizer (one that generates its own sounds, not simply > > playing what is basically just a sampled sound) - hard to tell. I still > > think the Moog synthesizer sound is the best! > > Another thing that hardware synths have over software is the user > interface. You just can't get the kind of flexibility that you have when > you reach out and grab cables and frob knobs. One key aspect of nekobee is that it responds to MIDI continuous controllers. When I get time, I'll post the Xiosynth controller patch. My work-in-progress "single-oscillator + sub osc, 24dB/oct lowpass 6dB/oct highpass filter and choruser" synth that's *NOT IN ANY WAY AT ALL* based on a real hardware synth started life when I wrote a piece of code to map sysex messages from my Juno to OSC commands. Gordon _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
