On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 14:13 +0200, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007 1:08 PM, Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > lanas wrote: > > > > > OK, Linux synths are great. And yes, if many ways they are. > > > Although recently I got a M-Audio Prokeys88 and I swear the Warmpad > > > sound in there does not have any equivalent in richness in what I've > > > heard so far in Linux soft synths. > > > > Don't agree. > > > The sound quality of csound is top notch, and it's very flexible. > > Agreed. It is also capable of completely customizable microtuning, > which, despite what some of you may have heard, is not possible on any > hard synth. They may say it is- but you are limited by the number of > keys on the hardware, which is not the case with Csound. > I used to harp about the difficulty of using Csound with any fluency, > but this is a difference of degree, not of kind: It is hard to learn, > but I believe someone very experienced with Csound can work as > efficiently as someone very experienced with simpler interfaces, doing > the same tasks. But if you're going to play it like an instrument you'll still need some sort of hardware, which will typically have a finite number of keys. Writing .sco files isn't all that fun. --ll
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
