On Nov 20, 2007 6:52 PM, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Di, 20.11.07 14:42 "Susanne Schneider" <susemuse27@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > hi everybody, > > as an experiment on this item I compiled a kernel with modified > > config: I removed acpi completely and additionally deactivated the > > option "enable tickless..." (or so..). Then I booted the kernel with > > standard options. Result: Ardour behaves as it should, everything > > works just fine, system audio performance at it's best! Obviously > > there is a diffenrence between booting an acpi-enabled kernel with > > option "acpi=off" and a kernel built without acpi capabilities. Maybe > > somebody has an explanation - I don't... thanks for attention anyway > > Su > Hey there. Just to share experience : 2.6.23.1-rt11 #25 PREEMPT RT Sun Nov 18 14:01:45 CET 2007 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Dyn_ticks enabled ACPI enabled ACPI cpufreq with conservative governor HDSP multiface (with the pcmcia cardbus) jack latency @ 2.66 ms ardour 2.1 No xruns (exept with a few problematic clients like xmms2 or mplayer) no trouble with Ardour sudo cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource hpet __________________ Marc-Olivier Barre, MarcO'Chapeau. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
