>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:38:03 +0100 (CET) >From: Julien Claassen <julien@xxxxxxxx> > 1. .html-files: I meant instead of simple ftp-site have .html-files with >lists. So you can easily include files from othe sites/servers. ahh.... that's what i was missing -- the concept of including files from other locations. makes good sense. > 2. MIDI: I didn't mean sending in MIDI-tracks as real treacks. Just as a >possibility for the starter track. The monitor, if you like. ok, that's probably workable, although i'd probably render an audio track, at least for my personal consumption. ;-) > 3. About the looser: I know we wouldn't loose anything really. But Frank >Pirrone suggested only uploading the "winning" tracks in hifi-quality. that I >didn't like to much. I just meant: We could still have ALL, REALLY ALL, tracks >in hifi-quality, if we can distribute them. I think the greatest problem, that >Frank correctly saw, is bandwidth. But with multi-server distribution, the >problem is'nt anymore. yes, multi-server again. and the only other caveat i would insert is that there are likely to be a bunch of tracks NOBODY wants in the end, so there's no point including that hifi content in your "ALL, REALLY ALL". i'd say hifi content should be on a request basis -- i.e. the default is to always minimize bandwidth, until anyone needs to make a high-quality mix including any track. -- .pltk. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
