On Tuesday 13 November 2007 21:04, Frank Pirrone wrote: > blowing, or even preposterous -What kind of a moron would call a > search site...yawn...something goofy and meaningless, like Google?) One who immediately sees it as a more marketable spelling of the word "googol". > , the basic idea of aligned tracks posted to a project site in a > low-loss data format that can be loaded into something as humble as > Audacity, with tracks playing or muted to test additions or > substitutions, and when one contributor is done their track is > uploaded and the project file is saved and ready for the next > "edit" is a powerful one. Where I got stuck, and the reason I came up with all those ideas about streaming mix previews and bittorrent mixdowns, is where the bandwidth comes from. Not in terms of "OMG we need a business model ASAP", but in terms of "how can this be made efficient enough that it can be kept a community effort and not just a deluxe mp3.com?" I mean, if some big benefactor like archive.org gets in on this, sure, you can just start checking in WAV files willy-nilly. Maybe even some European equivalent of the NEA (since obviously sharing music is communism even it's your own, and thus my own government would have nothing to do with such an endeavor.) > contribution, but I don't know what would be the right side of > chaos, maybe a reasonable number of contributors on each instrument > would impose some inherent order. Whatever. I always envisioned just having all the tracks out there, and having any contributor able to make a mix (in EDL form) from whichever source tracks he or she likes. Rob _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
