Ricardo Lobo wrote: > > Hi People, > > I have two questions, or maybe we can call it, surveys. > > First: Is there anyone here who uses LASH? I tried it but I didn’t > found it useful, am I missing something? > hallo, for me lash is running good for muse, seq24, specimen and glashctl the problem that i see is that not that much jack clients are lash-ed. cheers, doc > > Second: Yesterday I was told to try the OSS V4.0, because it is – or > so I was told – better than ALSA. It goes against what I think to be > the common opinion around here. > > Thanks, > > Lobo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user