Hallo, Florin Andrei hat gesagt: // Florin Andrei wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >Hallo, > >Florin Andrei hat gesagt: // Florin Andrei wrote: > > > >>But this is wrong. There should never be duplicate messages anyway. > >>A client-side solution should not be used to fix a server-side > >>problem. > > > >Where's the server-side involved? > > Server-side _problem_ > The lack of a modified Reply-To The lack of a modified Reply-to is not generating a single duplicate mail. Humans using Reply-to-list do not generate duplicate mails. Humans replying directly also don't generate dupes. Only humans using Reply-to-all generate duplicate mails. I suppose most humans, who do the latter, do so to work around their mail clients lack of a proper List-reply-to, some may also do it deliberatly. Anyway, the mail client and the human, who uses reply-to-all deliberatly, are all independent from the server-side. And then, all of this duplicate issue is just a small blemish, whereas sending something private to the list, because the list software messed with the Reply-To-Header can be a huge embarrassment. And sending private stuff to the list because of Reply-to-munging *does* happen all the time, even on Windows-user lists. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
