On 18 July 2007 at 13:12, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > doesn't really matter. it was established as much as 80 years ago (and > possibly longer) that non-blind or even single-blind testing infallibly > distorts the results of any kind of evaluation, whether its house paint, > toothpaste, shoe comfort, chili powder or audio quality. any time you > want to establish that something is subjectively better than something > else, you owe it to yourself to figure out how to do that using double > blind techniques. its not about you, or the thing being tested. its > about the way human perception and psychology work. Even objective test benefit from double-blind testing, for instance drug efficacy tests. So, I agree with folks suggesting a blind test. It'd be fun to read the results of a good double-blind test of the "Resolution Project" DVD-A from someone with a really good listening room. Where I listened was fair, but not as good as a rung out recording studio. > > guitar player, and they run at 44.1kHz. I believe ardour wants > > all of it's data in the same format for each project, though > > projects can differ from each other. > > ardour doesn't care, but it also doesn't dynamically resample, so if you > mix sample rates, you will get pitch-shifting effects. OK, noted. Thanks.... -- Kevin _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
